=================================================
NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA
14547 Titus Street, Suite 214
Panorama City, CA 91402
=================================================
For immediate release: September 20, 2000
=================================================
For additional information:
Juan Ros, Executive Director
Phone: (818) 782-8400
Mailto:director@ca.lp.org
Web: http://www.ca.lp.org
=================================================
Libertarians announce positions on
November ballot measures
PANORAMA CITY -- California Libertarians support a proposed
voucher program and drug treatment over incarceration, while opposing
new bonds and restrictions on political speech, according to
positions on the November ballot initiatives announced today by the
Libertarian Party of California.
"Libertarians evaluate each ballot measure by asking: will this
measure make California more or less free? Will this law increase
liberty or restrict it? We make a decision based on the answers to
those questions," declared Libertarian state chair Mark Hinkle.
Libertarians endorsed what is arguably the most controversial
initiative, Proposition 38, the school voucher initiative.
"Government schools have clearly failed to educate children. Prop.
38,
while not perfect, is a significant advance over the status quo,"
Hinkle stated.
State Libertarians also back Proposition 36, which requires
probation and drug treatment instead of incarceration for nonviolent
drug law offenders. "Libertarians were the first to demand an end to
the War on Drugs," Hinkle pointed out. "Until that happens, Prop. 36
will reduce prison overcrowding, save state taxpayers hundreds of
millions of dollars per year, and probably save lives as well."
Also receiving the Libertarian endorsement is Proposition 37,
which would redefine certain fees as taxes. "Politicians have been
getting away with murder, avoiding tax restrictions by calling them
'fees.' Prop. 37 would put an end to that hidden taxation," Hinkle
said.
Proposition 35, which would ease rules on private contracting,
also wins an endorsement from Libertarians. "Public contractors
oppose
Prop. 35 for fear of losing their jobs. But Prop. 35 will end up
creating thousands of jobs -- and save billions in taxes," Hinkle
predicted.
On the con side, Libertarians oppose Proposition 32, a $500
million
bond act. "Bonds are the most expensive way to finance projects.
Plus,
voters just approved a $50 million veterans homes bond act in March.
There is no excuse for this initiative," Hinkle noted.
Libertarians also strongly oppose Proposition 39, the so-called
"Son of 26," which would lower the threshold for passing school bonds
from two-thirds to 55%. "Voters defeated Prop. 26 in March. To
qualify a near-identical initiative so soon is the height of
arrogance," Hinkle said.
Proposition 34, which would impose campaign contribution limits,
also gets a thumbs-down from Libertarians. "Libertarians accept no
restrictions on political speech, no exceptions."
Concluded Hinkle, "Libertarians always come down on the side of
greater liberty and less government. We urge voters to read their
ballot pamphlets carefully -- and we are confident that many voters
will come to same conclusion we did."
The following is the list of positions taken by the Libertarian
Party of California on ballot measures for the November 7 general
election:
Proposition 32: No
Proposition 33: No
Proposition 34: No
Proposition 35: Yes
Proposition 36: Yes
Proposition 37: Yes
Proposition 38: Yes
Proposition 39: No
|