=================================================
NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA
14547 Titus Street, Suite 214
Panorama City, CA 91402
=================================================
For immediate release: June 26, 2000
=================================================
For additional information:
Juan Ros, Executive Director
Phone: (818) 782-8400
Mailto:director@ca.lp.org
Web: http://www.ca.lp.org/
=================================================
Libertarians praise Supreme Court
blanket primary decision
PANORAMA CITY -- Hailing it as a momentous ruling
for all political parties, the Libertarian Party of
California praised today's 7-2 Supreme Court decision
striking down California's blanket primary, which was
approved by voters in March, 1996.
"This vital decision emphasizes the importance of
political parties' freedom to choose their own
candidates," stated Libertarian state chair Mark
Hinkle.
"We are very pleased that the Justices, after
hearing the arguments from both sides, saw how the
blanket primary undermined the very existence of
political parties."
Under California's blanket primary system, voters
could cast ballots for any primary candidate
regardless of party affiliation. The Libertarian
Party of California, along with the state Republican
and Peace and Freedom parties, joined the lawsuit
filed by the state Democratic Party challenging the
blanket primary (California Democratic Party v. Jones,
99-401).
In arguments before the Supreme Court in April,
state lawyer Thomas Gede defended the blanket primary,
saying the election "belongs to the voters" and that
the blanket primary has increased voter participation
in California.
"In a sense Mr. Gede was right: elections do
belong to the voters. But there is an enormous
difference in the purposes of partisan primary and
general elections," Hinkle noted.
"The whole point of a primary election is for
the voters of each party to choose the candidate that
best represents their party's point of view for the
general election. If any voter can vote for any
party's primary candidate, why should political
parties even exist?" asked Hinkle.
"Increasing voter participation is a noble goal,
but not at the expense of political parties' freedom
to associate," Hinkle added. "Voters who affiliate
with a particular party should be free to choose that
party's candidate without interference from non-party
members. Voters who for whatever reason choose not
to affiliate with any political party really play no
role in party primaries."
Hinkle praised past Libertarian state chair Gail
Lightfoot, under whose administration the party joined
the lawsuit and who has served as the party's point
person on the case for the past four years. "Gail's
tireless efforts have borne fruit, and on behalf of
all California Libertarians I thank her for her
commitment to this case."
|